Saturday, February 26, 2011

Freed Pointe Shoe Difference

Sinich: 10 km road race




For the gentle reader of this blog, there is now the fifth Competition this year's report. The first competition-block is therefore close to completion. Then it says to bring once more air for the months of May and June, which I could try the (almost impossible) qualifying for the Mountain Running Championships (Bursa, Turkey, July 12).
stand today to say the 10-km road race from Sinich a four times, amounting in to 2.5 km long circuit on the program. Brilliant sunshine and mild temperatures ensured good conditions, a moderate breeze hardly bothered. On the
not quite simple path (such as sharp curves and 15 meters per round, which can vary the hours of 10 km sec), I thought right from the start up together with Hannes Rungger the pace. As Hannes attacked at km 7, I felt very well, but decided not to go down immediately. There was a gap of more than 4 seconds, about 800 meters to go I closed again, waiting for the sprint to him only to lose much.
The time of 30.59 will satisfy me, I'm close to my best times have come over this distance. 2001 and 2002 I have run 30.30 three times on the road to the only departing from the path it was 30.40.
Next Sunday is the aim of this competition-block on the program: the Lago Maggiore Half Marathon. I (and Hannah) are hoping for a favorable course of the race and a good time.

results 10 km Sinich, 02/26/2011:

first Hannes Rungger 30.58
second Gerd Frick 30.59
third Rudi Brunner 31.32
4th Hermann Achmüller 32.02
5th Georg Brunner 32.12
6th Ulrich Gross 32.25

first Elena Casaro 37.52
second Gertraud Höllrigl 37.54 more pictures at: running.bz

Low Vitamin D And Low Ferrin

The art of omission: When less training is more

actually behind the phenomenon, which I would like to dedicate myself today, a commendable feature: The competition objective is set, developed the training plan. But it is precisely on the day of the important interval training will take place in the company a staff meeting, which lasted until a late hour. Back at home, and quite exhausted, but running shoes are laced. It will extend the training plan adamantly implement. The training quality is then much to be desired. And so it is not really happy with it. Only the stress at work and then can not the target times are met ...

discipline is always respectable. But sometimes it is advisable to cancel out scientifically a training session or to replace at least a lighter workout. This is so easy to say. Mostly, we must first learn how it feels when, despite unfavorable circumstances, the training plan as "continuous" is. Injuries, performance, stagnation and mental fatigue are often the result. Nevertheless I would like to give some tips on the way to help you understand your training as something "Flexible". No training plan is set in stone. On the contrary, this view is a proven success.

The causes that make a weekly plan obsolete, are naturally different. The following has the "intelligent" Handling situation proved:
  • Unusual units make up / not avoid hard training two days in a row: Most runners believe that especially intensive training content produce a performance improvement. This is only partly true. If required by the external environment, it makes sense to cancel a "core unit" and they do not "catch up". The distance to the next scheduled and demanding workload is usually too short. In this respect the training failure, the exception to the rule remains is the event target is not endangered. In addition, so the next unit pace usually be done in better quality. To be carried out on "stress days" training that is easy continuous run (\u0026lt;60 minutes) is advisable, to process mentally and around the day. prioritize
  • core training units: Depending on the competition course, everyone has planned Train Santander core units, which are essential for success (eg long-running, speed endurance for the marathon). It has proven that the training sessions to put on those weekdays that are as insensitive to unexpected liabilities. Thus, a long endurance run will be completed in the work week when the overall perceived stress remains tolerable. Note only is a suitable distance between the core units in order not to impair the regeneration process. understand
  • Training: For example. includes mountain starts (10 x 300 m, 300 m trot break down) on the program. The short-term business trip to Amsterdam, however, prevents the implementation. It simply lacks the mountains. So it is advisable to seek a career (or measured distance) and, instead, 10x 400 m (flat) to run, so a similar stress period and similarly metabolism (important) to achieve a comparable training effect. 10x 60-80 s, depending on the level of performance in a park, etc. are probably the easiest alternative.
  • flights and long car rides: Never start an interval training in high speed areas because the hip extensors and flexors usually "tense" will reach the destination. Large movement amplitudes would increase the risk of injury. An easy continuous run with a final gentle running-specific stretching program provides security for the next day with fresh legs.
  • break tempo runs: In urban areas, often prevent pots and an uninterrupted, continuous running, which for example in the speed endurance is not optimal. It may be advisable to divide such a course into sections and to intersperse short breaks (\u0026lt;60 s), if only a short, disruption range is available (instead of 10 km endurance pace, eg 10 x 1 km with 60 s pause). To retain the continuous character, the speed endurance also be taken via shuttle run. Whereupon, the choice is ultimately dependent on the local situation.

Thursday, February 24, 2011

08 Honda Civic License Plate Mount

can all be wrong


The Captain of Guttenberg

Zu Guttenberg, formerly Dr. Guttenberg can, as a new "Captain of Köpenick" remain in office. Now he must also two other federal-Expertise absorb from the scientific service, to adorn his thesis without citation. Of this he had known nothing was learned. further in my text it was lively in my writing workshop that contains, in contrast to the blogs with little or no images.

Sunday, February 20, 2011

Does Anyone Still Wear Jock

Application for legal protection; - Refusal - Labour, the final

But the first movement is a dream. I hear again the word of the works, unfortunately, we do not support you there because you are not a union member more. I also hear a call of a works council, as soon as someone comes in with the man himself a few words of confidence. There will be no wonder if the Chamber of Labour for certain companies have already provided for agents.
So sit there together at least the two named below, at 9.2. this year, and decide on a request from me I will only bring in but, at 11.2. this year. Yes, Labour has its own calendar. Especially
sit together and decide on an application on which they so little knowledge as possible want. On the actual date of the application there was no interest, only the word, yes, I see the documents, I will mention this, that all evidence is there. Labour of Labour. Safe? Is this safe way?
The Labour do not know what a friendly solution! She tries awkwardly to divert most, however, pointing to the Berechungsblatt and sees it as nothing comes out morally reprehensible, more than the following is written before the signature at the end of the outgoing people. And if my love nice ex company had written into the offer, they pay me to board a monthly amount of x, and I mean Signature would have set lower, then this is responsible for the offer is that of doing it. Point. As the train runs over it. There is indeed nothing illegal or harmful in the offer. It is a trivial bonus for half a year because they will now suddenly contradict the agreement. As if this company works agreements literally, and what I care about them even today? The company has offered me that. "We also save them to pay a pro rata incentive payment to the exit date." And almost at the end: "As a sign of its acceptance, we ask them, have signed the enclosed copy and return it to us." Such is, solicitation and Adoption. Signed twice, before my signature. As it should be in this company. Four eyes of control. A two-sided transaction. (From the consensual solution, which is a bilateral transaction), the company wanted someone with whom she has not fulfilled its obligations to fulfill (duty of care, a job offer would have most likely prematurely brought to the grave), go have, so what she has a problem with this pay out ridiculous premium for the company. Too bad that I did not know eight years ago what I know now. The councils have been sleeping at that time. At least the responsible upper floor.
to service certificate:
Over to name a department in which I was most of the time, with the list of all department heads, I can not very well offer to help. Apart from a few of the products.
"The final statement of their salary, a certificate, as well as her personal papers, please contact your relevant Human Resources Operations Center." (From the mutually agreed solution, a two-sided legal business) is
Nothing of employees in the service certificate. Questions in advance, as long as it was easy, we did not use.
I am not obliged to cooperate. I expect respect as a last proof of a service certificate, and the more it is true, the more I will keep the company in mind. Because to me my health stolen, has of course a heavy task.
All right, a simple service certificate. But it must be true. None of the three templates has done so. A critique on the first template remained unheard.
Just read what the Labour writes.
The designated person to know about the reality. The Labour here expressly affirms the practice that the service employee to write outgoing certificate itself. Maybe I'm
old-fashioned, maybe I'm not a salesman, but a Certificate for service that I write myself, has no value, the fact I'm wasting a thought.
The company is in my case, the duty of care not met, but now they could times confirm that it at least the record keeping requirement is met.
A small addition to the agreed solution I've been doing. "With the performance of this agreement all mutual claims and demands of their employment are paid in full." The Stolen time can not therefore be intended. Or the company will confirm here that the fall it?




request for legal
Dear XXXX!
The Chamber of Labour of Vienna announced that the legal
Commission in its meeting on 09.02.2011 to your request dated 11.2.2011 to grant relief to the company Siemens AG Austria, Siemens Street 90, 1210 Vienna has been no result.
According to § 4 para 1 lit a and b of the General Regulatory concerning their legal rights by the Austrian Chamber of Labour is required for the administration of justice among other things, a sufficient legal justification of a claim of the employee under the facts found and the prospect of a positive outcome of the proceedings for the assessment of law and evidence.
After the facts of the case ended and conditions of service by friendly solution. In the preliminary calculation of your termination claims incorrectly, the incentive payment for the current fiscal year into account. This is due, however, according to current guidelines BV only the completion of an employment relationship because of retirement, which is not present with you.
be incorrect from a preliminary calculation of claims, however, no legal claim
derived.
This is but according to the Vienna Chamber of Labour or from a legal point of view, nor the existing evidence, a reasonable prospect of a positive outcome of the proceedings.

respect your service certificate was given to you by your former employer explicitly the possibility to improve this and amended.
also our request to us the desired announce changes and additions
to induce an improvement in the service certificate, you have failed.
Legal Protection Commission was therefore able to give your notice that no further application.
But if you, contrary to the Vienna Chamber of Labour are believed to enforce a claim against the company Siemens AG Austria, you have the option of your claim by a the Labour and Social Court Vienna, Wickenburggasse 8 - 1080 Vienna, even to be introduced Protokollarklage on each Tuesday from 9:00 to 12:00 clock) to be asserted. Please note any rate applicable to your claim for revocation or limitation.
you have the option of an appeal against the decision. This is addressed in writing to the Commission's notice and justification.

Mag Irene Wood Bauer, Head of Legal Department
Mag Herbert Novotny, Head of Legal Department

Saturday, February 19, 2011

09 Spyder Electra Triggers

running style, stride frequency and co: the last word?

were determined in the past week, the sports science reports and discussions of two issues: Firstly from the comedy barn around the cycling doping case and acquittal A. Contador of . Second, accumulated in the relevant blog - by chance - contributions and debates on a topic that has become a perennial (?): What running technique is the cheapest? What are the most effective step frequency?

The issue I raised last year with a contribution to barefoot . It was also about running technique. Illuminating Related misunderstood topic I've found this week at 3 U.S. authors. This I would like to refer directly. Because I am in poor health a bit, I lead you to the original sources and waive a detailed Comment. These are the articles:
starting point is the blog post of the biomechanical Jay Dicharry from the University of Virginia . He treats the context of running style (front, center, rear foot movement) and ground reaction forces . It is commonly claimed that generated pre-and mid-foot running at the lowest landing, the force peaks and the orthopedic health is most conducive.

His research shows, however, that do not depend on the amount of force peaks of the running technique, but primarily from the position of the landing foot relative to the gravity . So there are rearfoot runners where a very thin ground reaction forces are measured, and forefoot striker with high values. He also points out that exercise upper body posture and muscle tension a significant influence on the ratio of gravity / foot position. In brief: A selected drive technology is neither good nor bad. There are some elite runners who run on the back foot (in the highest speeds) - and the efficient and injury free.

Runners World writer Amby Burfoot takes up the theme and extends it to the aspect of "cadence". run beginners are distinguished in that they are more low stride frequency select position (relative to the absolute speed) and the landing foot far forward (which leads to high ground reaction forces). A countermeasure is to increase the step frequency or barefoot. The steps are smaller, the foot automatically lands closer to the center of gravity. What in this respect (un) is reasonable, he describes quite calmly. Also what findings in elite runners, and developments in running market is concerned.

The third member is a sports scientist Steve Magness. He reaches his hand back on both previous articles and is the sense of a step on the frequency alone directed training in question. Do we ever focus on the cadence? Previously, he gives an overview of the kinematic relations, derived from video recordings.

Saturday, February 12, 2011

Balcony Pot Holders Uk

Algund-Vellau the Fifth?

Not at all. After
had four victories in 2003, 06, 09 and 10, I now run from the mountain after Algund Vellau the chance to enter the number 5. It was But otherwise, on my home track, where I train hard in the summer mountain-interval, I went for the first time a defeat.
Knappe 7 km and about 600 meters from the village there are Algund to Vellau Church until 2009 there was the goal, including in the café Vellau Ladurner, so the track was half a mile shorter than now. My recent times there were up to: 27.45 (2003), 27.37 (2006, course record), 28.8 (2009), 28.24 (2010, transit time). This year
now ruled ideal conditions (no wind, 10 degrees), was also strong competition at the start. I tried it with a fast start and could have easily after 100 meters , To settle for a km Castle Hannes Rungger. After 8 minutes of the race, at the beginning of the mountain road to Vellau, we had 15 seconds advantage on the track record, 3 minutes later I had to be torn down in the middle section of the trail was extremely Hannes pressure. 2 km before the finish line I had a good 20 seconds behind and began to catch up-when I went to Café Ladue 27.32 through the finish I was exactly 1 minute faster than 2010. On the final day victory were missing 8 seconds
My performance today makes me confident to be on the right track.

results:

first Hannes Rungger 29:47

second Gerd Frick (Telmekom Team South Tyrol) 29:55

third Mikhail Mamleev 30:43

4th Rudi Brunner (SC Meran) 31:29

5th Franco Torresani (Atl Trento) 31:48

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Sunfish Sailboat Hull For Sale

Legal Aid application Labour and Social Court continues

When I got this letter, I was surprised at what the postman has noticed visible, who writes me something. I had not expected. Later I became aware that there does a state apparatus. How it works. How it works. I see people sitting at a table and talk about the case saw no one, no words about it. All this is interesting. For a correct view of the points about which no one has made. has only taken at the beginning of everything, it is quite well covered, but much was open and that's why these methods help, so that someone makes a very good look then. Now I can read a little on the substance but not negligible distortion, is one of two points and thus must be some must not be that it intends to disappear from view. In the former company, it was similar, and people have talked for months to decipher and played wrong even a few hundred people, but has discovered the error was never invited. The state apparatus is alive. Yes, that's safe. A closer look must be missing me. I will not judge. But one thing I am left wondering how many such cases, and solves problems of the time, because there is no interest in solving this conflict more easily, because the time has passed over it.



"The Appeals Court, pursuant to a Court of Appeal, in work and social welfare cases by the Senate President of the Higher Regional Court (Name, Title) as Chairperson and judges of the Higher Regional Court (name, title) and (name, title) (Senate § 11a para 2 ASGG) in the case, the requesting party (name and address), because of legal aid, represented by the following appeal by the federal auditor of labor and social Court Vienna against the decision of the Labour and Social Court Vienna on 12.10.2010, 9 Nc 34/10w-3, taken in closed session Decision: The appeal is given
episode, repealed the contested decision and the case for a fresh decision after further proceedings on
the trial court remanded.
Reason:
The applicant sought the granting of legal aid in full to bring an action against his former employer, Siemens, because
issue a service certificate and payment of outstanding remuneration in connection with an inaccurate recording of hours worked and otherwise of a
Operating Agreement concerning certain Absences for a total of about EUR 700, --.
With the contested decision, the trial court granted the applicant applied for legal aid in the amount of § 64 paragraph 1 no 1, 3 and 4 ZPO without further notice.
This decision depends on the appeal by the federal government, represented by the auditor at the Labour and Social Court in Vienna, due to defects of the method and incorrect legal assessment with the application to annul the contested decision and apply to the court of first instance a new decision after further proceedings.
The applicant has not been involved in the appeal process.
The appeal is justified in the result.
The appellants complained, rightly, that the Trial court had failed to clarify whether the applicant's commitment in his power - legal expenses insurance cover specified in § 64 para 1 No 1, 3 and 4 ZPO cited legal costs - that the contested decision was clearly based.
The list of assets of the applicant on 20.9.2010, ON 2 has a legal expenses insurance to insurance policies in the XXXXX-No. XXXXXX with a sum insured of EUR XXXXX, without, however, provide an indication of the length. This does not however been fully resolved if all if the cost listed in § 64 para 1 no
1, 3 and 4 ZPO procedure in this contract by the insurance company be worn. In this respect, the list of assets is not completed.
The trial court would be based on this flawed legal aid application was required to initiate an improvement procedure under § § 84 and 85 ZPO a deadline. omitted, since this has been a substantial violation has occurred (Klauser / Kodek, ZPO16 (2006) § 66 E 11 c).
The appeal was therefore give order and set aside the contested decision. The first court to pass on the continuing process to complete the list of assets, which are all necessary to teach the rejection of a cover letter from the legal protection insurer.
is also This confession of the assets in need of completion on the examination of a possible maintenance claim by the applicant to his wife and one below 3.4 indicated other income. In this regard, referring only to the applicant submitted supplements without result from this more evidence of such.
are also discussing the need of information from the applicant in particular on outstanding liabilities to the assets in the confession given home ownership.
this regard is the commitment to asset disclosure by the Land Registry data and the amount and the due date if all related liabilities supplement
.
will finally be with the recent decision on the legal aid application if no legal protection cover is added to take into account that the documented to date income in the amount of EUR 1226.10 per month in unemployment compensation not only
is irrelevant to the unattachable amount to a wage garnishment and the no caring responsibilities or face liability. Considering this, it would be possible to
applicants, at least in part by § 64 para 1 No 1, 3 and 4 ZPO covered costs of the intended proceedings themselves, without its necessary maintenance at risk. "

A few words from me on a small contribution to that nothing is missed:

"the applicant has not been involved in the appeal process is there, so a few words. I was with the appeal in the Labor, I once heard that I must do nothing that it was only a message that runs all the other times, two weeks later, a consultancy, there is nothing more, legal aid is refused, no ensure there is no duplication.

why I was surprised, but pleased of the disclosure of the decision.

To the point.
your colleague at the very beginning the matter in the near future in all acceptable words has taken. Here are now two points from a point and unfortunately distorting.
The 700 € refer to difference calculation sheet and the actual payout. The calculation sheet was at least accurate of the department which is responsible for everything. After all, the basis of mutual consent.
not applied operating agreement covers two points, one is a few years back, the company was not then and still less willing to accept this time at all that they mistakenly see the staff members, has been withdrawn (not loud, quiet already, as the program unnecessary after a long discussion has been changed), the other point is perhaps still wrong that this would be a just cited point of absence. Since the 700 € would not be enough by far.

your colleague at the very beginning has talked about legal aid in full because the matter is very complicated and extensive, and I was always in the expectation that I will even invited so that the situation is looked at very carefully before you as many other steps here.

way, I passed on the Labour get a third presentation of a service products (all other points are no longer for Labour for an answer from the company Siemens relevant, despite an otherwise mutually agreed solution, a two-sided legal business), which is not very different from the first two, still only the last few months have led to foreign occupation, ignored the rest completely.
understand why I was pleased this decision.

As for my financial situation now rests with the Land Registry. We received only a week before Christmas. It takes everything.
Any maintenance claims against my wife?
We live together, and it will stay that way. My wife goes to work. If this answer is sufficient. Otherwise, we have
large expenditure, the apartment requires some work. This was feasible at that time because we had to look at a new, but because a new cooperative apartment had no living and quality of life and was not to buy.

As more and more is desired, then please tell me. "

Monday, February 7, 2011

Electric Box Soluce Iphone 19

certificate for service - the continuation of an eternal story

The continuation of an eternal story. A company finds it not worth the trouble to exhibit at least end up with a proper certificate of service as a small token of respect for a man many years of his life as one says, profits generated for this company. It was probably too little. But in times like these, it is never enough for some people.
can be speechless in this society. The reason should command it to do something properly before you get unnecessary problems, and it is not satisfied, home if you do a good job for the benefit of all?



words of Labour:
"In attachment I send you that of your former employer now issued the original certificate of service, including cover letter.
If you have requests concerning amendment of the certificate issued service, I request you kindly to me any additional requests in writing disclose to 02/11/2011. Should I up to this point you have not received any news, I am assuming that the service certificate issue in the present form in order "

letter:
. I regret the delayed delivery of the service product, but obviously there has been to date
communication or delivery problems.
If you have any change or additional requests, tell me this in writing,
, so I make the changes immediately and give you the final, finished
- can send testimony as soon as possible.
I would like to but can also tell us that the fact of this delay is not in my range, but that you have been asked several times in the past to leave us
supply appropriate information, which unfortunately, for what ever reason, did not come about. "

My answer Names are defaced with XXXX:
Dear Mr. XXXXXX,

I do not understand how you pass a third presentation of the Labour sends me this and if I have no objections, I'll assume that. Differences from the first template? Little difference, except that I am at least once not more female, after all. This template
I reject, of course.
ignored to criticize my lack of cooperation that I had nothing more to say because it is not heard, after my first criticism has not been heard on the first bill, a nearly identical second template for it.

Does that mean that your investigations, where I would have to help in your view, have shown nothing at all? That no one knows at the company, what I have done all these years? What is being added to data in the workflow, plus a master number, an identification number. This reminds me of one word from a colleague who has been asked what he is doing everything documented because they were surprised how much profit these small department makes. Made now.

Well, the man was in the longest time in this company proving grounds, and has printed circuit boards primarily for EWSD systems (supervision of two Spea machines, among others) and a variety of products (computer circuit boards, phone, ... ..., this is too much everything and I will do not turn me perhaps because the vocabulary for it has come already lost, the head is full with other things) tested and diagnosed, bug fixes itself. Head along this line were XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX very briefly (it is very important, it was not a single word between him and me), XXXXXX, and XXXXXX in the end (which is after all a few feet away sat by XXXXXX). These were only to make present, almost 19 years, do not occur in this template. Does this mean that a service requires only the testimony in which they happened to be on the last working day, which could indeed be just a day? Siemens. Major corporations. What kind of claims. You should
be easy to turn it into a detailed testimony of qualified service, with all I've done, how I did it as I have lived with humans. Exemplary. Oh yes, incited by some, but who knew me would have preferred that I do the work of work.

What's in the template that was not exactly I do not actually done so. Maybe after a year. Power. Not my area. I have not learned. Successful sounds like sport, not for work.
Ah yes, the industrial accident, a consequence of sleep disorders, exhaustion, since expenditures familiar abbreviation for a word of the foreman, to self-representation after everything, which was a mistake. I should have checked. Then who can but trust? Great opportunities for cooperation. But I was so weak that I was grateful to less than every action, because I was in those early days, like others, just as Bimbo (citing, as it has seen another well) was used.

Among the other topics: Labour folds up, yes. Regrettable. I want to see how others react.
calculation sheet no fault causative effect. I do not know, I will ask the next course, more accurately, above all others. All very interesting. Morally, well, it is not, for exactly this sheet from your department is but a basis for a decision. So if I would be charged, would have voted it.
aliquots premium. If my memory does not deceive me get all this has been gone eight years ago.
you know what is a bilateral transaction. And that an amicable resolution, also including falls.
Well, the company is often sheared for about anything. Leave agreement is also included. Do you have any idea how many of my colleagues often complained that the holiday release in the AZM was suddenly gone? This is not a bug.

As for the lack of time, so there may be this time, but this does not alter the fact that the company would have the correct time without being asked would need. By the way I did it then requires you to ask Mr XXXXXX. He has refused to even hit it that, once the others. Rejected. Despite entitled to it. Works have been asleep, and the Recruiter, which are both the employer and the employee committed, and one has noticed it and certainly would have had to sit up. Whether
but need to keep all institutions in this country at this time is another question. You learn quite a lot. Some may go back more than three years.
This is my time I was in the company where I put my work freely available (in the first ten years in any case is not much time seemed to be as rigid Layer and every quarter of an hour longer a gift to the company was), and the story correct the settlement has brought me a call had of the consequences. It would then have been a matter of one hour, and eliminates errors detected and compensated people. Point. Not discuss one years almost nonsensical and explain. A very simple thing. What a company.

in mutual agreement. Okay, you can put it that way.
But if a person experiences as a company is not responding to health problems, is even made by some ridiculous, then man must pull the emergency brake. Where was
company doctor and the works safety department and more than five years. Where in this last time. Later I could yet realize that now but ear protection is mandatory at risk of dismissal, who does not respect it. Do you know what I was a more than half a year before listening to this?

I have a group from a small area out nearly twenty years have seen that is not enough. That it is over, is good. And that I would intervene as a Recruiter is unthinkable.

Sincerely

It should be clear to do if Labour and the Labour and Social Court for me enough that I then go to an employment lawyer. And although all the points are given.

Here's my new address: ... ... ....