"We were your letter, the City Councillor for Housing and Urban Renewal Mr Dr. Michael Ludwig, for processing. We want to point "Why I may not now even search for a new tenant" below will be happy position. "
It is then talked about the criteria, with all figures, very detailed, and possible additional investment and as controlled by the tenant could be, by pointing out that this is not forced to deal with this. With no word is received on my lines. At least five weeks after my letter, by a team leader for offering management sent me. How intense must have been well these discussions that such a response can be so long in coming. More a standard letter, an advance copy, the art was only related to the transition from my words in this block mosaic.
By the way, my whole sentence: "Why should I now do not even search for a new tenant, the course meets all eligibility criteria, which I, after his request, the apartment so admit that I'm happy too."
What else did I have written about a decision of a non-purchase of an apartment that I is not looking for another place to stay ausgesundheitlichen reasons I had so I could not burden the housing office really, for healthy living to the tasks of this group.
After all, there was an answer, point two of my letter to the mayor's office has had no response, even to this day. It is election time, there should not be surprised.
Every third dismissal awarded by the Housing Service Vienna, all the other cooperatives would itself be interesting to know who is now mainly responsible for the collection policy. For the Altmieter pull out after the series. For me, life was hazardous to health in this settlement.
has a say nothing of the tenant, even though he pays more than two-thirds for the effort. In the other third not put the city of Vienna, to the promotion, no, you can not see it, the other third puts the taxpayers because the city of Vienna swells only on their debts. What to expect from a city public property leases and get no real cost about the citizens can.
recalculation should not, at least not before: building costs deducted from the grant, at least for twelve years now about 12%, would you leave the money in the bank, then it would now be 34.5% higher (at 2.5% Net interest). What that means purchasing power, which I spin now not continue.
The tenant still gets only one priority list sent to you. For a counter-priority list, I will expend no more energy. Every one can easily imagine, when a Man with the money that he once in his life, the apartment is not purchased and renovated as a non-yourself a new apartment, because this step was not reasonably safe. If you then experience that something striking, which the tenants are not even noticed, you have to imagine life in those four walls so that is best in a corner sits just so good careful, if you look at the door moves to pay the rent. Must! Because that is what this game is that people are found Abstottern this financing on credit.
This long chapter is now closed. After the first night in the new apartment I was wondering how I was able to just more than twelve Years of life.
The last letter is read (by the way, first time see the new utility, a loggia is now involved full!):
The cooperative owns the house. Can we have something that is not paid, you can have something with a proper share of 0%? That's right, of course, no longer quite, because the cooperative can be by the tenants (annuities, rents with which to repay the cooperative on behalf of the loan amount) and taxpayers (the tenant does not pay any housing assistance, at least 1% of gross salary - he may not even in life really have something like this?) Buy the house, and deters the most People before making a purchase with an excessively high revenue from sales and then stripped by the way the promotion with one. But Two is better, so a few lines "were used for construction of the house loan funds and capital adequacy of non-profit housing associations." Underneath in a moment, but that it should really be enough. Never such a thing. And I advise everyone to such a thing to see. Cooperatives are not more cooperative.
0 comments:
Post a Comment