Anyone who goes after many years from a company that wants as quickly as possible behind you, forget and move on. Aftermath can not avoid. A long time has a long history, many stories, as much can also hurt. You should let some time pass for a new beginning of the silent treatment so it does not inadvertently flashes and not fitting into a new life.
a complaint about the missing service certificate:
require more than I can not, and if the corrected template on it is one thing, my criticism has been ignored, I no longer react. I want a service equivalent to the testimony of the reality of almost twenty years. Has is not entitled to? I want it I do not write themselves, and I will not ask five times, where it is now.
It looks like that because some men still live in a corporate world that this service is later framed certificate just to show it to the grandchildren of well-deserved retirement. How different words are interpreted, if a department is sold, but people in the new company still have a job that they do not even need this, because they are unemployed. There are stories of thirty years of work and more here. You see, even as far as we take care of you sounds through it, although the company has shown how far it is to get rid of people. Or why should Other people have for their life of this urgent need, this really chase after many many months. That is nothing but a reflection of how this company with the working people is handled. A medical history of the people of the past ten years would be more meaningful.
of claim two, the wrong final settlement:
This is not much to say. On the same day to censure, two weeks later, a short message, testimony and statement are now ready for inspection, but for me at least nothing has arrived. No further response. If the shortage of staff to meet even this department has, as indicated by a works council? It lacks something that is not a luxury but an entitlement, which is also included in the agreed solution.
This is to say that the projection, always based on mutually agreed solution, significantly different from the actual settlement. Significantly, of course, in my view, are those figures for the company nothing. No explanation of the Company with one of them.
action point three, the minutes with one addition, since the shortness of a first drawing a little inaccurate:
"There are significant differences in the calculation of the time of day balances. This is due to an error in time recording program. So the times were incorrectly calculated by the program. Because of this Error, shift workers, when this one minute log off before the end of planned working time, pulled off a total of 0.4 hours (in minutes: 24). This led to a significant extent on working hours that were not paid. Despite repeated Urgenz and intensive talks, also involving the works council, there was no result. The bug has been fixed
2002, adhering to time but to this day from uncorrected. There was still no apology or compensation.
For about 10 years is a valid operating agreement (BV 10) is not applied correctly. This provides, in point 5.1.2, that for certain periods of absence (eg sick leave, special leave, care responsibilities, Military service, etc) anyway time credit for windows days are collected. This is not applied by the Board and it is to save against the current BV leisure days in the window by incorporating. The company Siemens denies the validity and leaves no discussion on this matter. Even for those working so far no compensation or compensation was offered. "
It is first of all to time it was mistakenly removed (from a determined point, however, deliberately, because the company knew about it) and by the time you do not get credited because the operating agreement does not apply (this could still apply).
time you Should not have, at some point will cost something. Especially in a year like this, adverse to the holidays around the calendar year not to fall, the people will feel especially when they look at their time account.
It has lasted from the first pointing out the error to the correction, quietly and without this correction, almost a year. By a return of wrongfully withheld hours, no speech, an apology has never existed.
From the minutes:
"In the consensual resolution agreement, although there is a general clause that states that all claims and demands from employment would be settled, in my opinion, this referred to but not sure The above three points of contention, as I had in this regard until last contact with the management to cease and to my claims. "
The company will say but hardly loud that is meant by this general clause, the stolen time. I would have if nothing else comes out, like writing.
So is the way in this company with the people deal:
"The issue of" gift "was in 2003 settled in our opinion, and discussed sufficiently with you."
In a previous post I had enough I missed it, after hear such words with reality have nothing to do nothing.
Therefore, to clarify the outsider, I should have done much earlier. little
0 comments:
Post a Comment