Labour Vienna, another experience on how response to a solicitation and editing of legal protection, as announced, I had to wait too long, late filing I had to do something, although I did when I was there, and it all had to. The appeal has led me to this step.
surprised me the answer why not?
If there are already competent person for certain companies, which for me has been an unpleasant aftertaste. Also in the newspapers You can hear the good cooperation. Since I will not continue to think out loud here.
Labour was eight years ago worth for many people a way. However, it was an unnecessary way. For Siemens staff no information could hear it, goes to the union. There she heard her go to Labor and the question you have a works council, I'm starting, then this. Why are we happy here, the answer. Then, no more. At that time, eight years ago, mass layoffs and wage cuts, the unequal social injustice in this oh-so company. The low-income workers came to kiss on the hand, some employees could say to mock this loud, even if not intended so, just happy to be lucky, I only removed it. The representatives, ie the later works, which we did not know.
But anyway, that is history, here the full text of the response of Labour: Referring
"on your legal application for protection has the legal protection commission of the Vienna Chamber of Labour put back your claim provisionally, as your claims have been asserted again with your former employer and In this regard the issue of outstanding service certificate has announced that the same applies in the next 14 days would be sent.
What keeps you, in regards to your request addressed differences in the final statement, the Siemens AG determines that you have sent in advance calculation leaves no fault causative effect. There were dealing with preliminary calculations. That is the Labour convey to calculate Journal of you wrong - as is shown in this incorrect, the success fee for the current fiscal year. In accordance with current guidelines, however, BV-performance bonuses due for the current fiscal year only for employment termination due to retirement. In your case, however, is not a retirement before, so the reported amount does not come to settlement.
What concerns you raised in your letter of 27/12/2010 false time records, they are already back more than three years. Even assuming that this resulted in any differences in pay, details of which were already barred, so no basis exists for any action anymore.
will conclude noted that now the entrance to the outstanding service certificate is awaited and taken as a result a decision about your legal application for protection by the law Commission for the Protection of Labour Vienna. "
the first paragraph, in terms of service certificate it should be for such a company for a matter of course that promised (for the last working day, long ago now) and has what they claim, is being honored. The company has done in this matter when so many others, internally I feel are so many not to vote. There is a department responsible for training and various other things about which I would like to lose no further word, but this goes under when someone comes into a new department, it is as if he had been there forever.
the second paragraph. "That is the calculation of Labour submitted Journal of you wrong," Once again, a quick look at what gave me the company.
"CALCULATION SHEET FOR LEAKS (workers)
settlement of the bonus (according to BV guidelines)
compensation performance bonus for last year
compensation incentive payment for the current fiscal year,"
The settlement of a cancellation of a contract is signed, or drawn, our characters, HR OC / ad, the name we hide here polite. Nor can I say.
"We also save them to the payment of a pro rata performance bonus for the exit time." Can not expect, or have done this deliberately? Or even the work that I am unfortunately not an isolated case states but also calculation sheet for resignations, Version 3.0. Really modern.
that workers of this so easily swallowed, is interesting, after all, this is even in the consensual solution to this pro rata share. The difference is more than just these aliquots premium. can Does this mean that pure-write the company can do what she wants to stakeholders to entice to sign and then say it is not correct, these are all only provisional figures which have to do with reality, "no fault causative effect. "What do you call something normal in the language. A trap, a trick? From how much difference then listens to the Labour. Enable them not in a position of such a situation that a person be (drawn from HR and BV according to the guidelines) as a calculation sheet provided and a contract without a clue that this is only likely to be so. Attention is drawn to the contrary, it is good as these figures that the company can cost you a lot, so how can you say no, take it and go and be happy. And that is wiped away with a service agreement. That these do not always agree, but the company has already proven. Know these people, the management agreements? They should take better care to ensure that this can also be applied correctly, as long as there windows days and especially as long as it is to shift work Example, must be applied in a specific point in the BV 10 and BV can not be worse than the collective agreement or even a law - a specific point for many years will not apply. have set up works councils, and that the amicable resolution, this my favorite department in this company. Human Resources, what cynicism. This vote can not, because employees are always on a right and unfortunately I can only add that I've copied everything that the company always took pride in was that there was no difference between employees and workers in this company anymore. Have never heard of a favorable provision, or what a unique Premium (which this is not going to it) and what does it mean if this one is not expressed.
Besides, they always settled aliquot that was never a problem for this company, and theme. Particularly at this time eight years ago, many were lost during the fiscal year and got it all, at least something.
anecdote, on the first day AMS will I still wonder what if there are people looking for whether I would work there also - as if this could be an issue. No, because I would have to go very badly that I would start thinking about it. Such joint work difficult, but I am now too old and I have to look at me.
the third paragraph: unfortunately, the fear. It's not about the writing of this day referred to the detailed illustrations but a few days before. Then probably only remains to find someone of these time limits are not matter, but they can do something in spite of these time limits, after all, it has been deliberately withheld.
Here I vorwerden me that I have not forced this Researcher look hard right after it, there was the answer that is that if they do then take it, is to assume the. They will provide only an indication that sufficient documentation is to do so. Regrettably today, because I would have forced them out to respond all the time what their friends have not made where they would get an idea of the time at issue, or what would be paid this time value. Because in the end they say but in this system, time is money. When it is over Austria, and I presume, then half a billion euros, the lower limit. Hard to say because I can count only roughly. But this number is larger every day.
say this, I again: the works (there were a few exceptions) and the company management have shown the the error is treated very badly and when she corrected at last they had to have shown no interest in the people the stolen time back return. So small the numbers do not. Time that the people who worked in the company for the company. A failure of the councils and the management of this area and that very department named.
has gone under the Labor, errors continue even today.
questions do I wonder how long the people of this country have such empty shells of institutions are nothing more with the reasons for their existence, with the time in which they were created, have to do. Workers for chamber and employees must not miss the ÖGB Signum, but when a company says something and answers are still the brain cells and blocks the brain turns.
passed so-an institution after another from my life. It is but to do this to force the right thing for the people, as long as there are these institutions. After all, they stand there and should be used for the good of the majority.
live How do these people work there? That remains the only when I enter such buildings in mind, what survives, what makes me worry.
